HYNDBURN opposition leader Councillor Graham Jones has admitted he is prepared to hand back planning committee allowances he claimed after missing nearly half of last year’s meetings.

Councillor Jones excused himself from seven out of 16 sittings of the borough’s most prestigious committee due to work commitments, but still claimed the full £724 ‘special responsibility’ allowance.

According to figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, the taxpayer paid out just under £300,000 in Hyndburn councillors’ allowances in the last financial year.

Councillor Jones, who has since left the planning committee, said he was unable to attend meetings when they were switched to morning start times mid-year but admitted he did not realise he had missed so many.

He said: "When I went on the committee I believed I could attend most of the meetings. I would be more than happy to give money back to the council. I’m not in it for the money and I’m quite happy to give all the money back. If somebody said to me I don’t deserve the allowance I would probably agree."

Over 16 meetings between May 2008 and April this year the absence rate of planning councillors was 20 per cent, higher than the worst school in the country.

Only once, in January, did all the members attend planning and only Councillor John Griffiths, who received an allowance of £6,582 as chairman, attended every meeting.

Councillor Munsif Dad missed six meetings as did Councillor Susan Haworth, although she claimed less than her full entitlement as she asked not to be paid for the period before her retirement.

She said: "I took a reduced allowance as I don’t like being paid for things that I’ve not done."

Hyndburn’s chairman of the scrutiny committee Councillor Doug Hayes has pledged to raise the issue of special responsibility allowances at the next scrutiny work programme.

He said: "If people are willing to take up these positions they should give it their full commitment. I will ask that we have a look at the way the benefits are paid out to people and whether they are earning it. If you don’t attend a meeting and you call a substitute then that sub should pick up the money."

Council leader Peter Britcliffe said: "I would love to pay allowances only on an attendance basis but because of the current rules that apply to us from a national level we are not allowed to do that.

"I think these are matters for a councillor’s conscience but if they were on the planning committee and didn’t attend perhaps they should claim a reduced allowance."

Councillor Jones has also expressed his support for an attendance based system, and has accused the Tories of "milking the system" by monopolising all the most senior roles for which allowances are paid.

Council leader Peter Britcliffe’s allowance of £31,297 was the highest amount paid out to any member, comprised largely of the leader’s special allowance of £20,448, plus £1,187 in mileage and £859 in carers’ allowance.

The highest petrol allowance was racked up by deputy leader Councillor Peter Clarke, who received £1,334 at 57 pence per mile, while Councillor Pamela Barton received the fixed mayoral allowances totalling £6,858.

Overall, Councillor Malcolm Pritchard was the lowest claimant, taking just £1 of his basic allowance of £4,498.

SURNAME
FORENAME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
Britcliffe
Peter
31297.57
24068.02
514.98
859.16
1187.82
280.06
-
-
-
-
-
Dawson
Bernard
4637.99
0
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Parkinson
Miles
5836.06
1448.03
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Clarke
Peter
16586.38
10864.28
0
0
1334.07
0
-
-
-
-
-
Hayes
Douglas
11000.03
6362.04
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Barton
Pamela
11863.30
253.61
0
0
314.90
48.76
-
5858.00
1000.00
Walmsley
Brian
10623.37
6235.34
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Battle
Jean
422.89
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Griffiths
John
11860.27
7222.28
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Dobson
Anthony
7076.95
0
0
0
0
0
249.96
1215.00
500
723.96
-
Lockwood
Jean
5820.81
1432.78
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Roberts
Brian
16669.36
11588.24
401.22
0
203.75
88.12
-
-
-
-
-
Mason
David
4388.03
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Rahman
Mohammed
4637.99
0
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Broadley
John
5111.99
723.96
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Jones
Graham
11860.27
7222.258
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Myles
David
422.89
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Storey
Janet
10334.83
5946.80
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Barton
Paul
6447.97
723.96
0
709.73
302.67
73.62
249.96
-
-
-
-
Dad
Allah
12440.15
7762.72
0
0
289.40
0
-
-
-
-
-
Haworth
Marlene
14992.57
9786.76
287.46
0
106.00
174.36
249.96
-
-
-
-
Wilson
Lynn
13851.20
9213.21
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Pritchard
Clare
7225.06
2580.64
56.88
0
100.75
28.70
-
-
-
-
70.06
Liddle
Jennet
10490.66
5863.12
0
239.51
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Atkinson
Roy
5111.99
723.96
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
McCormack
Collette
4510.45
0
0
0
122.42
0
-
-
-
-
-
Gott
Paul
6024.83
723.96
0
463.64
199.24
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Collingridge
Nicholas
4696.03
152.12
0
0
0
0
155.88
-
-
-
-
Dad
Munsif
6656.13
1364.24
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
653.90
Grayson
Harry
4637.99
0
0
0
0
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Pratt
Kathleen
5111.99
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
723.96
-
Parkins
David
5028.31
640.28
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Horne
Stanley
4812.05
0
0
0
174.05
0
249.96
-
-
-
-
Ayub
Mohammed
5932.32
723.96
170.64
0
350.55
49.18
249.96
-
-
-
-
Smith
Joan
4875.68
0
0
0
20.16
0
226.44
-
-
-
653.90
Haworth
Susan
4455.41
480.23
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
Morris
Phillip
35.03
0
25
0
10.03
0
-
-
-
-
-
Hussain
Rahila
30.90
0
25
0
5.90
0
-
-
-
-
-
Whitehead
Frank
30.90
0
25
0
5.90
0
-
-
-
-
-
Pritchard
Malcolm
1
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
297,849.60
124,106.82
1506.18
2272.04
4727.11
742.80
3881.76
7073.00
1500.00
1447.92
1377.86

Key
A = Total amount claimed in accruals in £s
B = Total special responsibility allowance in £s
C = Total conference allowance in £s
D = Carers allowance total in £s
E = Mileage total in £s
F = Subsistence total in £s
G = Computer allowance in £s
H = Mayoral allowance 1 in £s
I = Mayoral allowance 2 in £s
J = Chief whip / group sec Con in £s
K = Chief whip /group sec Labour in £s
*figures exclude basic allowance of £4388.03

View Comments (3)

Reader Comments (3)

Councillor Jones works tirelessly for our community. I notice that he hasn't claimed anything for mileage whereas some councillors have claimed over one thousand pounds. Councillor Jones does drive and does use his car for the work that he does for his constituency. He obviously bears the cost of this himself. The mayor receives £6858 which equates to approximately 1440 miles! I have neither met the mayor nor, received any help from the mayor. Why am I as a taxpayer paying for this allowance? I also don't see councillor Jones claiming for dealing with community problems that he has often handled during the early hours of the morning, 2am on one occasion that I know of. This man works hard for our community with little recognition. I am all for removing politicians from power that abuse the system but would happily pay more for people like councillor Jones that actually care and make a difference for the better.

As for the “Gobbin‘” comment, why are you living in Lytham and posting comments in Accrington? Don’t you realise that a “Gobbin” is an idiot? If you are foolish enough to use the name Gobbin and, talk like a gobbin(idiot), don’t you think it would be best not to advertise the fact?
Christopher Seymour18/07/2009 at 20:06
This article was a disgrace. The article refered to my allowances but the headline shouted expenses. The Observer printed online my expenses and they were £zero.

I give hours and hours and opposition leader never end at going to residents meetings, filling in grants forms, helping people. The money issue is rubbish. I wish people like Gobbin had the guts to ring me up and ask the truth. Three months ago the Tories accused me of being involved in filling pot holes on my street. Last week, it was the fact I had attended only 9 of 16 Planning Meetings and was paid the £724. Before the election it was snidy emails about my family. A dirty tricks campaign. Firstly the £724 per year is a fixed allowance paid from the start of the year and what readers were not told was it includes a further 16 pre-planning meetings, 2 hours reading of Planning Reports before every meeting, occasional site visits, 6 to 8 extra major planning briefings and full day planning training sessions. All time off work unpaid. Secondly; I always arrange a Labour substitute when unable to attend so all 16 meetings were covered. This year (and in previous years) I am a substitute member of the Planning Committee. Substitutes do not receive any allowances at all, so I will lose half day's pay at work each time I sit on the Planning Committee. This rota system of unpaid substitutions across all committee’s was not reported either. Thirdly; I reluctantly went on the Planning Committee because very few Labour Councillor's are eligible or able. 8 out of the 12 are in full time jobs, only 8 have had the required special training. I have a full time at job at a private company so juggling the two is very difficult. Fourthly; Council Leader Peter Britcliffe knows this so moved the Planning Committee from 5.30pm to 2pm and increased Labour's places on the committee from 3 to 5. I asked Councillor Britcliffe for more work friendly times and he declined. Furthermore mid way through the year following opinions Councillor Britcliffe did not like at one meeting, he retaliated by moving the Planning Committee to 11am in order to stop me attending which despite my efforts to attend, affected my attendance record particularly at the end with 11am starts. The Tories have used the Planning Committee for political gain. This year the Committee have lost an experienced member. As reported I am no longer on because of the problems they have caused with work.

Graham Jones District Councillor Peel Ward County Councillor Accrington South (Baxenden, Barnfield and Peel Wards)
Graham Jones 9/07/2009 at 17:38
Well Hyndburn...What do you think about your elected representatives having there snouts in the same trough as your MP? What a nice little earner a council seat is. And many of them don't even attend the meetings. Councill leader Mr Britcliffe tells us "I would love to pay allowances on an attendance basis but the current RULES don't allow it" So Its Mr Britcliffe who pays Well thats OK then. And the same response as the MPs THE RULES. But I think its the Taxpayer who pays but more importantly it is the councillors who CLAIM. It's a club they don't join for the money but once inside greed takes over and some not all, milk the taxpayer for all they can. They are in it for the money and their protestations of innocence only make it worse.The word hypocrite comes to mind.
Gobbin, Lytham 4/07/2009 at 08:53
1 Show  10 | 25 | 50  per page