PROTESTERS fear a Hyndburn windfarm could rupture a mineshaft filled with more than half a tonne of radioactive waste.
The Environment Agency has confirmed the mine, used for waste disposal in the early 1950s, contains 0.7 tonnes of uranium.
Located off Elton Road in Belthorn, it’s just a few kilometres from Oswaldtwistle Moor, where developer Energiekontor wants to locate a dozen 400ft-high turbines.
The Stop the Hyndburn Windfarm group claims turbine vibrations could destabilise the mineshaft and potentially cause a radioactive leak.
They highlight a landslide at Derrybrien, Ireland, in 2003 which dislodged 450,000 cubic metres of peat over a 32km area, polluting a river and killing 50,000 fish. The incident was attributed to work at one of Europe’s largest windfarms.
The Environment Agency recently concluded an eight year-long probe into water quality around the Belthorn pit, but has not objected to the planning application.
Seven hundred tonnes of waste were deposited there between November 1951 and August 1952, including construction materials, incinerator ash and ‘low hazard, radioactive material’.
Environment Agency officers say the uranium is contained in various materials within the mineshaft, rather than in a discrete ‘block’, and say that a nearby brook was monitored until as recently as 2006 to ensure radioactive materials were not escaping.
A spokesman said: "The levels of radioactivity seen in the brook were consistently low and typical of those normally experienced in the local environment.
"The results are below the World Health Organisation Screening levels for drinking water and were also below the screening levels designed to protect wildlife from the effects of radiation."
But residents remain unconvinced and have written to MP Greg Pope expressing their fears.
Mechanical engineering student Jack Whalley, of Haslingden Old Road, claimed: "The wind turbine is a large structure which forms a strong bond with the ground.
"Even if there is a 0.1 per cent chance of a risk of radiation poisoning, then this application cannot go ahead."
Fellow protester Stuart Kaufman, of Redshell Lane, said: "We don’t know exactly what is down there, how it was encased, how deep it is, how other shafts and tunnels from mine workings are connected, and how much water that passes through the site finds its way into public water supplies.
"The fact that it is monitored nearly 60 years after it was dumped is reassuring in one sense, but causes alarm in that there may be a hazard that could manifest itself at some future date.
"Otherwise why bother monitoring it? What we need is openness and candour."
Anti-windfarm residents have also claimed the project would degrade the peat blanket bog, harm the habitats of protected birds and cause intolerable noise pollution.
Local councillors Doug Hayes, Marlene Haworth and Brian Roberts all sit on Hyndburn’s Planning Committee, which is due to decide the application.
Councillor Roberts told the Observer that, like all members, he was obliged not to debate any plans before they come to meetings and must remain impartial.
Peter Harrison, of Energiekontor said: "The windfarm will contribute a substantial amount of clean and sustainable electricity and it is important that anyone who supports the windfarm should make their support known both to local councillors and the planning department."
Comments can be sent to Hyndburn Council's Planning Department, Scaitcliffe House, Ormerod Street, Accrington, BB5 0PF, or emailed to planning@hyndburnbc.gov.uk.

Sign up to the weekly
news
Most recent user comments 4 of 4
"As it happens I too am a scientist. I know what proof is. I don't believe you have any. This is just NIMBY scaremongering from someone not wanting a wind farm." You definitely never came across as a 'scientist'! Especially one who does not understand vibrations of any form or sort! You clear ignorance to these initially stands testament to my point. A "scientist" would specialise in certain fields, it is clear mechanical and acoustic vibrations are not yours.
At current, leading noise experts, natural science academics are investigating this relatively new phenomenon. Prof Dean along with Dr S Crowe are leading these investigations with theories specific to mine and have subsequently wrote in their letters of support of such.
"I also note your poor use of the English Language, which does not fill me with confidence." I do apologise for the use an a instead of an e. Councillor has two l's by the way.
"Oh, and I'll bet these NIMBYs have never bothered to campaign about the nuclear waste before.... just a guess... " Indeed you are correct, however this is notably not a regular thing, plus it is a new revelation, hence how could we possibly campaign prior?
"I'd like to see them all put their money where their mouth is and join Greenpeace." Certain members of Greenpeace are in fact aiding us with our investigation.
4/02/2010 at 09:41 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Could you please provide links to scientific studies to support your claims?
I say again - this 'vibration effecting the radioactive waste' idea is a load of nonsense.
So, Jack - please provide EVIDENCE. Not just your opinion.
As it happens I too am a scientist. I know what proof is. I don't believe you have any. This is just NIMBY scaremongering from someone not wanting a wind farm.
I also note your poor use of the English Language, which does not fill me with confidence.
Proof please...
Oh, and I'll bet these NIMBYs have never bothered to campaign about the nuclear waste before.... just a guess...
I'd like to see them all put their money where their mouth is and join Greenpeace. They won't though - why? - because they're just a bunch of NIMBYs using nuclear waste scare stories to support their flimsy case.
29/01/2010 at 12:21 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
"The radioactive waste in the Belthorn pit will be subject to REAL vibration from the M65"
The M65 is a totally different level of vibration. The wind turbines emit a low frequency vibration, generally unlike a motorway. This is a phenomenon that has not been studied and you are clearly in no position to rebuttal to this arguement on this basis.
My point is backed up by: "and not made up vibration from wind turbines. Let's be clear - you don't get ground vibration from wind turbines."
Do you think noise are vibrations? Well in fact they are Mr Rice, there is one form. Here is another, the sub acoustic vibrations are being documented by leading academics as we speak!
"They're just using it to support their selfish NIMBY interest"
You are telling the members and readers that you would not mind if there was a radiation seepage? "Raising such nonsense undermines the credibility of the anti-wind campaign." This is not nonsense, this is a documented idea which is backed up by leading professionals unlike yourself.
"I say to the council - the NIMBYs are talking a load of old toot" Based upon my above review.. I believe it could be yourself who is talking the "old toot"!
25/01/2010 at 18:12 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
23/01/2010 at 12:25 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.